Asus P8P67-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics62.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121130
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 27 '19 at 23:52
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 80
1-Core 105
2-Core 204
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 389
50% 378 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1600 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
62.1% Good
Lighting 77.1
Reflection 82
Parallax 107
63% 88.6 fps
MRender 79
Gravity 80.6
Splatting 66.2
61% 75.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 244 260 274 294 278 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 222
Write 208
Mixed 107
SusWrite 268
147% 201 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 1.3
483% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 141%
Great: 213%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 2TB-$121
807GB free
Firmware: CV23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 159 157 160 161 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 155
Mixed 72
SusWrite 159
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/8GX 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
39.6% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 12.6
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 13
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M PRO Builds (Compare 389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M PRO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $554
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback