Asus P8P67-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '19 at 20:03
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 212
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 401
54% 406 Pts
64-Core 413
26% 413 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250X
PwrHis(1787 7260) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Lighting 16.5
Reflection 16.3
Parallax 22.5
14% 18.4 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 15.3
Splatting 18.6
13% 15.9 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
782GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 197 205 186 92 211 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 268
Write 268
Mixed 101
SusWrite 164
146% 200 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 2
539% 4 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 125%
Great: 213%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 2TB-$121
2TB free
Firmware: CV23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 167 166 166 169 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 152
Mixed 73
SusWrite 168
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/8GX 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
46.7% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.9
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M PRO Builds (Compare 389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M PRO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $554
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback