Asus P8P67-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics62% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121130
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 27 '19 at 23:50
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 88.6
2-Core 209
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 390
53% 392 Pts
64-Core 393
24% 393 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1575 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
62% Good
Lighting 77.1
Reflection 81.1
Parallax 105
63% 87.7 fps
MRender 78.8
Gravity 80.6
Splatting 65.4
60% 74.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 238 214 266 275 273 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 288
Write 276
Mixed 104
SusWrite 252
167% 230 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.8
548% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 155%
Great: 213%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 2TB-$121
807GB free
Firmware: CV23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 158 157 160 161 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 158
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 159
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/8GX 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
41.2% Average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 12.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 13.4
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M PRO Builds (Compare 389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M PRO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $554
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback