Asrock X99 Extreme3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.5 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '19 at 17:51
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$143
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 129
2-Core 262
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 875
85% 697 Pts
64-Core 1073
66% 1073 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$1,438
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2827 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Lighting 195
Reflection 208
Parallax 210
159% 204 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 190
Splatting 128
121% 150 fps
Poor: 108%
This bench: 137%
Great: 132%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,535
Write 6,326
Mixed 6,243
1,423% 6,368 MB/s
4K Read 704
4K Write 344
4K Mixed 436
1,808% 495 MB/s
DQ Read 1,284
DQ Write 986
DQ Mixed 998
784% 1,090 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Sandisk SD8SN8U-128G-1006 128GB
6GB free
Firmware: X4120006
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 495
Write 322
Mixed 334
85% 383 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 52
189% 69.3 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 220
188% 277 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 89%
Liteonit LMT-256M6M mSATA 256GB
15GB free
Firmware: DM8110F
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 491
Write 390
Mixed 264
84% 382 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 84.2
4K Mixed 42.1
149% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 177
156% 233 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 88%
Liteonit LAT-256M3S 256GB
13GB free
Firmware: VBA2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 454
Write 352
Mixed 276
80% 361 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 40.1
151% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 174
158% 240 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 93%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
127GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 78 80 81 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 75
Write 63.7
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 79.2
48% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
100GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 67 65 64 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 69.2
Write 70.2
Mixed 52
SusWrite 65.3
47% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 68%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
2TB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 144 144 146 147 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 146
Write 113
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 144
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 83%
Great: 96%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
439GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 100 100 101 102 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 89
Write 61
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 99.3
55% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KHX2400C15/8G Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 KHX2400C15/8G 32GB
2512, 2512, 2512, 2512 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
112% Outstanding
MC Read 44.3
MC Write 44.1
MC Mixed 40.6
123% 43 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 23.7
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 59.2
68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 112%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 200 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $460
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback