Asrock H61M-DGS

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock H61M-DGS (all builds)
Memory	6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120907
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 25 '19 at 21:58
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Memory 90.9 1-Core 106 2-Core 199 77% 132 Pts	4-Core 412 8-Core 518 60% 465 Pts	64-Core 521 32% 521 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126 94,030 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Sapphire(174B E353) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1370 MHz, MLim: 1950 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.5.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	55% Above average	Lighting 69 Reflection 69.9 Parallax 89 56% 76 fps	MRender 70.7 Gravity 66.1 Splatting 58.4 53% 65.1 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 150GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF4500RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 93 84 86 109 58 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32% Below average	Read 245 Write 214 Mixed 208 SusWrite 108 43% 194 MB/s	4K Read 12.7 4K Write 14.3 4K Mixed 8.9 38% 12 MB/s	DQ Read 108 DQ Write 75.3 DQ Mixed 23.4 36% 68.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 56%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 1.5TB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 165 179 162 174 155 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 187 Write 184 Mixed 35.9 SusWrite 168 104% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 137% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1333EL Series 2x4GB 878 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	60.8% Good	MC Read 22 MC Write 21.5 MC Mixed 19.5 60% 21 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 18.8 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 66 61% 66 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-DGS Builds (Compare 1,038 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-DGS - $68

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	158x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	101x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	78x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	116x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	80x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	54x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	62x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	26x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	18x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	22x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	13x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $155

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16