Asrock H61M-DGS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H61M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '19 at 19:11
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 103
2-Core 206
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 520
59% 460 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
Sapphire(174B E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 1950 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.1% Very poor
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 64.4
Parallax 75.5
1% 47.1 fps
MRender 64.4
Gravity 60.2
Splatting 53.9
48% 59.5 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 131 28 12 29 100 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.9% Below average
Read 247
Write 192
Mixed 211
SusWrite 78.6
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 29.6
4K Mixed 17.3
66% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 98.6
DQ Write 30.9
DQ Mixed 39.7
36% 56.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 56%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
1.5TB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 175 154 166 169 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 178
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 168
102% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
130% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 100%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1333EL Series 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.3% Good
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 19.2
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.7
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-DGS Builds (Compare 1,044 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-DGS - $68

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback