Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-S2V  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '19 at 11:35
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User PSE-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 103
2-Core 163
72% 119 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 276
34% 260 Pts
64-Core 267
16% 267 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100
Sapphire(174B E322) 2GB
CLim: 1060 MHz, MLim: 1625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.3.3
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Lighting 23.4
Reflection 29.4
Parallax 27.7
19% 26.8 fps
MRender 27.3
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 32
22% 26.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 60GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 62 47 59 50 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 352
Write 107
Mixed 148
SusWrite 57.6
36% 166 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 26.4
4K Mixed 11.9
66% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 14.2
DQ Mixed 6
19% 43.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 75%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
157GB free
Firmware: 1H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 116 118 116 116 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 98.5
Write 100
Mixed 66
SusWrite 117
70% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5030MM58E8F1600 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.9% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 13.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 13.6
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-S2V Builds (Compare 502 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback