| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 22.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Biostar H81MHV3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140703 |
| Uptime | 1.4 Days |
| Run Date | May 20 '19 at 19:24 |
| Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
69.3%
Good
|
72% 121 Pts
|
36% 269 Pts
|
17% 269 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1319 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.64
|
22.7%
Poor
|
22% 28.3 fps
|
25% 31.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
39% 178 MB/s
|
137% 53.4 MB/s
|
80% 108 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate ST31000424CS 1TB
390GB free
Firmware: CA14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 97 97 97 97 MB/s
|
57.8%
Above average
|
66% 89.6 MB/s
|
153% 0.97 MB/s
| |
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
581GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 158 162 162 162 162 MB/s
|
90.3%
Outstanding
|
90% 125 MB/s
|
148% 1.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown SH564128FH8N6TNSQR 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
|
47.5%
Average
|
45% 15.7 GB/s
|
44% 15.6 GB/s
|
64% 63 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H81MHV3 Builds (Compare 916 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Biostar H81MHV3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 126x |
| Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 86x |
| Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 85x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $237 |