Biostar H81MHV3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar H81MHV3  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140703
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateMay 20 '19 at 19:19
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130-$41
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 97.8
2-Core 189
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 270
36% 269 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1322 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.64
Relative performance (0th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Lighting 4.63
Reflection 26.2
Parallax 36.2
4% 22.3 fps
MRender 35.9
Gravity 31.2
Splatting 27.4
25% 31.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 226
Write 127
Mixed 171
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 99.5
4K Mixed 36.2
136% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 94.9
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 101
77% 102 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 75%
Seagate ST31000424CS 1TB
390GB free
Firmware: CA14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 96 96 97 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 102
Write 101
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 96.4
65% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 62%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
581GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 145 161 161 162 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 146
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 158
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SH564128FH8N6TNSQR 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
47.6% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 13.9
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81MHV3 Builds (Compare 916 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H81MHV3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback