Biostar H81MHV3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar H81MHV3  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140703
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateMay 20 '19 at 18:48
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130-$41
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 100
2-Core 185
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 270
36% 269 Pts
64-Core 266
16% 266 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1324 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.64
Relative performance (0th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 5.33
Reflection 26.2
Parallax 32.8
4% 21.4 fps
MRender 35.9
Gravity 31.2
Splatting 27.5
25% 31.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 239
Write 124
Mixed 166
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 98.1
4K Mixed 36.7
139% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 95.4
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 74
65% 97 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 75%
Seagate ST31000424CS 1TB
390GB free
Firmware: CA14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 98 97 97 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 100
Write 99.5
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 97
65% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 62%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
581GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 147 159 162 162 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 150
Write 150
Mixed 32
SusWrite 157
88% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SH564128FH8N6TNSQR 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
47.9% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 14
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 15.9
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81MHV3 Builds (Compare 917 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H81MHV3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback