ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 2394BP1

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo 2394BP1 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 2394BP1
Memory	10.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190327
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 18 '19 at 18:14
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3720QM-$100 9,911 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	73.3% Very good	Memory 80.4 1-Core 95.3 2-Core 188 70% 121 Pts	4-Core 366 8-Core 474 54% 420 Pts	64-Core 474 29% 474 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 21F6) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	4.15% Terrible	Lighting 4.57 Reflection 6 Parallax 3.12 4% 4.56 fps	MRender 6.05 Gravity 2.57 Splatting 8.65 5% 5.76 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.15% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100 67,541 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 222GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR040 SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 465 199 152 151 153 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Read 436 Write 442 Mixed 380 SusWrite 264 86% 380 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 47.2 4K Mixed 27.6 91% 31.8 MB/s	DQ Read 235 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 302 220% 284 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 95%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 410GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 454 443 436 386 387 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	95.9% Outstanding	Read 471 Write 420 Mixed 418 SusWrite 426 98% 434 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 48.7 4K Mixed 35.1 110% 36.5 MB/s	DQ Read 392 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 298 244% 347 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 859B CT51264BF160B.C16F 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53% Above average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 16.4 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 17.4 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 79.8 50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback