ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 2394BP1

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Lenovo 2394BP1 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 2394BP1
Memory	9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190327
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	May 06 '19 at 15:00
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199 30,496 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	58% Above average	Memory 80 1-Core 86.6 2-Core 143 62% 103 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 214 28% 212 Pts	64-Core 212 13% 212 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 21F6) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.89% Terrible	Lighting 4.37 Reflection 5.77 Parallax 3 4% 4.38 fps	MRender 4.76 Gravity 2.43 Splatting 8.3 4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.89% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100 67,541 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 221GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR040 SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 354 338 149 150 145 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	71.2% Very good	Read 435 Write 384 Mixed 293 SusWrite 240 76% 338 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 45.7 4K Mixed 26.9 89% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 235 DQ Write 274 DQ Mixed 249 189% 253 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 95%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 410GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 443 435 433 392 380 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	Read 468 Write 425 Mixed 416 SusWrite 420 97% 432 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 46 4K Mixed 34 108% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 358 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 296 236% 330 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 859B CT51264BF160B.C16F 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	41.5% Average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 12.8 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 13.7 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 80.5 50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback