Asus KCMA-D8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus KCMA-D8  (all builds)
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111104
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 17 '19 at 14:54
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 4226
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 77.8
1-Core 53.6
2-Core 107
50% 79.6 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 342
30% 256 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Asus(1043 841F) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.3% Poor
Lighting 30.9
Reflection 33.5
Parallax 44.6
25% 36.3 fps
MRender 41.3
Gravity 37.7
Splatting 28.6
29% 35.8 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct250mx5 0 250GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 49 51 52 53 54 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.8% Average
Read 230
Write 208
Mixed 210
SusWrite 52.7
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 30.5
102% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 116
89% 122 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 117%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
222GB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 50 52 53 53 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 57.5
Write 37.2
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 53.1
31% 42.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
77% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 59%
LSI MRSASRoMB-8i 146GB
102GB free
Firmware: 2.11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 222 224 225 225 225 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
131% Outstanding
Read 232
Write 232
Mixed 89.4
SusWrite 224
142% 194 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 1.4
314% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 131%
Great: 134%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
322GB free, PID ab28
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 73 74 77 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 42.1
Write 64
Mixed 50.4
SusWrite 73.6
83% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.5
175% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 57%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
307GB free, PID 3322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 121 120 121 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 118
Write 84.8
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 120
124% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965516-069.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.2% Average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 14.8
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 11.8
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KCMA-D8 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus KCMA-D8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 5% - Terrible Total price: $62
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback