Asus KCMA-D8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics25.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus KCMA-D8  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111104
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 26 '19 at 17:52
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 4226
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 66.5
1-Core 51.9
2-Core 104
46% 74.2 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 345
32% 264 Pts
64-Core 454
28% 454 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Asus(1043 841F) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 327.23
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.7% Poor
Lighting 30.9
Reflection 33.5
Parallax 36.6
25% 33.7 fps
MRender 41.3
Gravity 29.8
Splatting 28.6
27% 33.2 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 527ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 7.3 6.9 6.5 6.8 6.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 27% Great: 69%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
73GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 90 87 85 87 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 149
Write 119
Mixed 134
SusWrite 86.1
27% 122 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 20.3
77% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 26
DQ Write 71.1
DQ Mixed 23.2
25% 40.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37%
Great: 73%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
306GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 64 64 65 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 66.2
Write 64.7
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 64
41% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38
394GB free
Firmware: 3.AEF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 63 63 66 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 65.7
Write 64.3
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 64.4
44% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
114% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 42%
LSI MRSASRoMB-8i 146GB
102GB free
Firmware: 2.11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 223 223 224 225 224 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
133% Outstanding
Read 240
Write 235
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 224
142% 196 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 1.4
326% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 133%
Great: 134%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
338GB free, PID ab28
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 69 75 77 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 73.5
Write 103
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 72.1
106% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.6
206% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 57%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
327GB free, PID 3322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 103 104 103 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 111
Write 85.9
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 103
116% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965516-069.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.9% Below average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 12.2
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 8
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KCMA-D8 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus KCMA-D8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 5% - Terrible Total price: $62
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback