HP Z620 BASE MODEL WORKSTATION

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Z620 BASE MODEL WORKSTATION  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158A
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '18 at 16:58
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 69.3
2-Core 143
58% 96.8 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 449
43% 355 Pts
64-Core 1,051
65% 1,051 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon X800 XT
AMD(1002 0302) 256MB
Driver: atiumdag Ver. 8.56.1.16
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 1.88
2% 1.61 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 300 304 300 296 299 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 926
Write 307
Mixed 298
SusWrite 300
100% 458 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 35.7
178% 73 MB/s
DQ Read 879
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 410
351% 532 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 135%
Great: 127%
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: GKAOA94A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 80 81 83 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 79.4
Write 72
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 81.3
52% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965516-069.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 12 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 8.2
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.2
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback