TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus PRIME Z390-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z390-P  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190124
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 15 '19 at 22:27
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 151
2-Core 300
99% 181 Pts
4-Core 598
8-Core 1,137
103% 868 Pts
64-Core 1,162
72% 1,162 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑
This bench: 103%
 Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.8% Below average
Lighting 39.8
Reflection 31
Parallax 37.4
32% 36.1 fps
MRender 38.8
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 35.9
31% 37.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 31.8%
 Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
77GB free
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 0.7 37 88 46 9.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 321
Write 105
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 99.3
33% 153 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 10.1
48% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 14.1
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 168
102% 104 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 36.5%
 Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
617GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 114 128 136 139 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 151
Write 154
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 124
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 78.8%
 Great: 112%
Hitachi HCP725032GLA380 320GB
223GB free
Firmware: GM3OA5CA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 74 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 72.3
Write 69
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 75.5
48% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 42.5%
 Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G4D26AFTA.16FBD BLT8G4D26AFTA.16FAD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 26.3
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 25.2
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 85% ↑
This bench: 85.2%
 Great: 106%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical PRIME Z390-P Builds (Compare 18,506 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390-P - $106

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel  $264Bench 97%, 550,833 samples5,552x
Core i5-9600KIntel  $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples3,210x
Core i9-9900KIntel  $399Bench 98%, 354,223 samples2,828x
GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia  $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples2,123x
RTX 2060Nvidia  $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples1,170x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples1,098x
SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel  $70Bench 191%, 163,917 samples751x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples705x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD  $149Bench 228%, 180,890 samples543x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples677x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples440x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples416x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $690
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback