Asrock Z370 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics58% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z370 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20171128
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateMay 15 '19 at 14:35
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$120
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 96.1
1-Core 129
2-Core 258
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 701
73% 588 Pts
64-Core 741
46% 741 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58% Above average
Lighting 70.5
Reflection 72.8
Parallax 63.4
57% 68.9 fps
MRender 74.7
Gravity 70
Splatting 71.9
59% 72.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,849
Write 8,154
Mixed 8,068
1,865% 8,357 MB/s
4K Read 912
4K Write 387
4K Mixed 512
2,243% 604 MB/s
DQ Read 2,479
DQ Write 1,722
DQ Mixed 1,830
1,440% 2,010 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
304GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 472 468 475 471 468 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 478
Mixed 450
SusWrite 471
107% 477 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 61.6
208% 75.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 358
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 130%
Great: 133%
WDC WD3200BEVT-2 320GB
222GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5 5.2 5.2 5.1 5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
7.88% Terrible
Read 39.5
Write 5
Mixed 9
SusWrite 5.1
14% 14.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.88%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 27.6
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 38.3
SC Mixed 28.6
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 53.5
75% 53.5 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 Pro4 Builds (Compare 4,144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Pro4 - $95

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $503
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback