MSI MS-17C5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 36% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMicro-Star GP73 Leopard 8RE
MotherboardMSI MS-17C5  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180904
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateMay 02 '19 at 14:10
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.8% Average
Memory 62.4
1-Core 38.4
2-Core 63.2
37% 54.7 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 186
20% 157 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 1215) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6471
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
3.12% Terrible
Lighting 3.27
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 3.25
3% 6.02 fps
MRender 4.95
Gravity 2.87
Splatting 6.3
4% 4.71 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.12%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G 256GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20140000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 401 416 426 428 426 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 707
Write 819
Mixed 756
SusWrite 426
153% 677 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 19.7
75% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 204
149% 195 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 171%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
749GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 124 125 125 125 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 141
Write 120
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 123
74% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD M471A2K43CB1-CRC 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
42.4% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 18
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 6.9
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17C5 Builds (Compare 1,455 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17C5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback