Asus M4A87TD EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4A87TD EVO (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 14 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100519
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 28 '19 at 05:28
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175 23,835 User benchmarks, average bench 54% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Memory 92.5 1-Core 50.9 2-Core 102 54% 81.9 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 284 31% 243 Pts	64-Core 302 19% 302 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$99 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.16 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Lighting 34.5 Reflection 24.9 Parallax 31.1 28% 30.2 fps	MRender 37.8 Gravity 32.4 Splatting 31.4 27% 33.8 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,472 Write 2,217 Mixed 2296 520% 2,328 MB/s	4K Read 210 4K Write 143 4K Mixed 23 424% 125 MB/s	DQ Read 540 DQ Write 396 DQ Mixed 476 353% 470 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 297GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 77 77 78 78 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	41.9% Average	Read 68.6 Write 40.8 Mixed 49 SusWrite 76.7 43% 58.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 166 168 168 161 168 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Read 93.7 Write 111 Mixed 68.6 SusWrite 163 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.5 190% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5673FH0-CH9 14GB 667, 667, 667, 667 MHz 2048, 2048, 8192, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.3% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 12.1 32% 11 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 9.9 22% 7.77 GB/s	Latency 63.2 63% 63.2 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A87TD EVO Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD EVO

CPU
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	36x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	25x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	19x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples	6x
HD 6850AMDBench 12%, 31,600 samples	6x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	4x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	3x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	4x
F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GBUnknownBench 29%, 5 samples	3x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $241

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $239	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $139	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16