Asus M4A87TD EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A87TD EVO  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '19 at 07:04
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 975
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 83.6
1-Core 44
2-Core 88.8
48% 72.1 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 174
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 3769) 2GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Lighting 32.1
Reflection 29.6
Parallax 42.6
26% 34.8 fps
MRender 41.1
Gravity 39.2
Splatting 33.5
31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
668GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 56 68 66 72 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 187
Write 174
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 65.7
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 112%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
392GB free
Firmware: 3.CHN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 60 68 68 72 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 71.7
Write 51.8
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 66.1
44% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 43%
Seagate ST3500620AS 500GB-$145
465GB free
Firmware: HP26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 98 103 103 104 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 100
Write 14.8
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 100
49% 67 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 59%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
465GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 124 131 131 131 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 99.5
Write 134
Mixed 62
SusWrite 128
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 77%
Generic- Compact Flash 4GB
4GB free, PID 6364
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.2% Very poor
Read 16.7
Write 8
Mixed 6
SusWrite 11.8
13% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 2.2
170% 2.73 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBRL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL0 16GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
33.4% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 12.4
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 8.7
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A87TD EVO Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $241
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback