Asus M4A87TD EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A87TD EVO  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '19 at 16:27
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 975
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 83.8
1-Core 44.6
2-Core 89.1
48% 72.5 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 174
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 3769) 2GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Lighting 32.5
Reflection 29.6
Parallax 43
26% 35.1 fps
MRender 41.7
Gravity 40.2
Splatting 33.8
31% 38.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
661GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 66 67 70 72 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 154
Write 151
Mixed 74.1
SusWrite 66.1
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 112%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
392GB free
Firmware: 3.CHN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 68 68 71 73 61 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
41% Average
Read 75
Write 50.3
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 67.4
44% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41%
Great: 43%
Seagate ST3500620AS 500GB-$145
465GB free
Firmware: HP26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 103 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 103
Write 13.1
Mixed 46.6
SusWrite 102
49% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 59%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
465GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 124 131 128 129 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 108
Write 53.3
Mixed 69.1
SusWrite 128
66% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.2
220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 77%
Generic- Compact Flash 4GB
4GB free, PID 6364
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.3% Very poor
Read 17.1
Write 10.7
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 11.8
14% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 2.3
173% 2.77 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBRL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL0 16GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
33.7% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 12.7
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 9.2
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A87TD EVO Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $241
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback