Alienware Aurora-R2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics63.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAlienware Aurora-R2  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0RV30W
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100628
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 23 '21 at 21:21
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$339
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 94.7
1-Core 72.9
2-Core 146
65% 104 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 349
38% 302 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
63.4% Good
Lighting 78.4
Reflection 91.3
Parallax 80.7
64% 83.5 fps
MRender 80
Gravity 78.7
Splatting 71.7
62% 76.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 480GB
145GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 206 205 173 203 209 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.1% Above average
Read 263
Write 225
Mixed 176
SusWrite 201
49% 216 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 19.2
72% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 143
113% 154 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 148%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MJAOA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 140 134 143 143 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 134
Write 144
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 136
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 92%
Seagate ST33000651AS 3TB-$229
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 131 132 134 134 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 136
Write 122
Mixed 68
SusWrite 133
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
186% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBRL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
42.6% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 13.9
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 11.3
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora-R2 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Alienware Aurora-R2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $398
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback