Asus P8P67 EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive44.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 EVO  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateApr 24 '19 at 11:41
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 92.5
2-Core 171
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 449
47% 375 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.5% Good
Lighting 76.6
Reflection 75.3
Parallax 73.1
62% 75 fps
MRender 69.3
Gravity 69.8
Splatting 69.3
57% 69.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY4 128GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.4.1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 86 79 114 101 115 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.7% Average
Read 156
Write 91
Mixed 108
SusWrite 98.3
25% 113 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 17.7
84% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 135
109% 156 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 81%
Corsair Force LE 480GB-$240
26GB free
Firmware: SAFC12.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 235 234 181 149 178 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.5% Good
Read 226
Write 213
Mixed 222
SusWrite 201
49% 215 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 29.4
101% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 145
123% 180 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
574GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 62 62 63 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 101
Write 96
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 62.5
59% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$159
87GB free
Firmware: CC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 65 65 66 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 112
Write 116
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 66.7
67% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 73%
Dc-600e Mirror Set 0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 85 84 84 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 132
Write 76.2
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 84.2
66% 90 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.1% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 17.2
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 18
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 EVO Builds (Compare 604 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 EVO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $662
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback