Acer Aspire X3400

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire X3400  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire X3400
Memory15.6 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100601
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateApr 23 '19 at 15:58
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X3 445-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
42.3% Average
Memory 67.8
1-Core 40.6
2-Core 83.5
41% 64 Pts
4-Core 99
8-Core 103
13% 101 Pts
64-Core 109
7% 109 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8422) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Lighting 25.1
Reflection 24.4
Parallax 31.4
20% 27 fps
MRender 34.2
Gravity 30.6
Splatting 26
24% 30.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 119 38 25 63 13 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.2% Average
Read 234
Write 190
Mixed 185
SusWrite 49.6
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 20
76% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 101
94% 144 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 90%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
361GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 83 82 84 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 72.5
Write 68
Mixed 46
SusWrite 82.2
49% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
446GB free
Firmware: SD1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 103 102 104 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 102
Write 13.5
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 102
50% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.4% Poor
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 9.7
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 7.5
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire X3400 Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X3400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback