Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	21.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X3 445-$100 3,101 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Memory 54.3 1-Core 41.5 2-Core 78.8 36% 58.2 Pts	4-Core 115 8-Core 116 15% 116 Pts	64-Core 120 7% 120 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 8422) 2GB CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.94 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	21.5% Poor	Lighting 24.9 Reflection 23.8 Parallax 31.3 20% 26.7 fps	MRender 33 Gravity 29.6 Splatting 25.8 24% 29.5 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB 36,832 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA12.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 71 60 28 123 15 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.6% Below average	Read 220 Write 152 Mixed 157 SusWrite 68.6 33% 150 MB/s	4K Read 13.4 4K Write 37.2 4K Mixed 12.7 56% 21.1 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 142 115% 163 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 90%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 381GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 69 71 70 71 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	38.3% Below average	Read 64 Write 69.5 Mixed 47 SusWrite 69.3 46% 62.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80 27,325 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 450GB free Firmware: SD1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 101 103 103 104 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Read 98.7 Write 13.2 Mixed 47.7 SusWrite 102 48% 65.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 20GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.4% Poor	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 9.1 25% 8.63 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 6.7 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon II X2 220AMDBench 39%, 5,045 samples	7x
Phenom II X6 1035TAMDBench 53%, 2,528 samples	6x
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	4x
GeForce 9200NvidiaBench 1%, 1,231 samples	4x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	4x

SSD
Burst Elite 120GBPatriotBench 38%, 3 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x
Ultra II 120GBSanDisk $76Bench 76%, 9,139 samples	1x

RAM
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 ACR256X64D3U1333C9 Unifosa GU512303EP0202 Unifosa GU512303EP0202 8GBKingstonBench 37%, 5 samples	2x
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 2x2GBKingstonBench 31%, 1,517 samples	1x
9905471-001.A00LF 2x2GBKingstonBench 39%, 663 samples	1x