Biostar Hi-Fi B85S3+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar Hi-Fi B85S3+  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '19 at 07:09
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$52
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 87.2
1-Core 109
2-Core 218
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 429
57% 428 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gainward(10B0 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 381.65
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
20.7% Poor
Lighting 24
Reflection 23.9
Parallax 30.2
20% 26 fps
MRender 33.3
Gravity 27.8
Splatting 24.7
23% 28.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 313 313 314 313 315 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 451
Mixed 440
SusWrite 323
96% 424 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 63.8
203% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 350
264% 352 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 119%
Great: 128%
WD WD7500AZEX-00ZF5A0 750GB
386GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 133 132 134 135 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 108
Write 103
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 134
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 93%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB
219GB free, PID 0408
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 17 17 18 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 27.8
Write 26
Mixed 19
SusWrite 17.5
30% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 43%
CT500MX500SSD1 500GB
303GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 17 17 18 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 29
Write 25.8
Mixed 27
SusWrite 17.5
33% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 7.8
556% 7.77 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 312%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXM 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBXM 0420 F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.3% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.23 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 8.5
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Hi-Fi B85S3+ Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

Motherboard: Biostar Hi-Fi B85S3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $451
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback