Biostar Hi-Fi B85S3+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar Hi-Fi B85S3+  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130509
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 09 '18 at 15:55
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$52
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 112
2-Core 200
78% 133 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 338
47% 349 Pts
64-Core 411
25% 411 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gainward(10B0 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 381.65
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
20.7% Poor
Lighting 23.8
Reflection 23.9
Parallax 33.2
19% 27 fps
MRender 33.6
Gravity 28
Splatting 24.9
23% 28.8 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 350 345 310 236 239 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 433
Write 489
Mixed 412
SusWrite 292
92% 406 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 78.1
4K Mixed 46.3
146% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 90.9
136% 255 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 128%
WD WD7500AZEX-00ZF5A0 750GB
312GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 108 109 109 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 109
Write 101
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 108
70% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 93%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB
247GB free, PID 0408
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 19 19 20 19 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 21.7
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 16
26% 20.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13%
Great: 43%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
15GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 17.7
Mixed 1.7
7% 9.7 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 2 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXM 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBXM 0420 F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.9% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Hi-Fi B85S3+ Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

Motherboard: Biostar Hi-Fi B85S3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $451
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback