Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive83.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3P  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111012
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateApr 20 '19 at 11:27
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 89.5
2-Core 183
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 334
44% 327 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Sapphire(174B E174) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Lighting 17.3
Reflection 13.4
Parallax 14.4
14% 15 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 17.3
11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
305GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 298 305 304 305 302 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 458
Write 268
Mixed 264
SusWrite 296
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 30.8
105% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 225
196% 292 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
454GB free
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 90 92 93 93 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 100
Write 95.5
Mixed 63
SusWrite 90.4
64% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
53GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 130 128 131 126 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 130
Write 107
Mixed 72
SusWrite 129
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 182 183 182 184 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 124
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 180
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%
LaCie Rugged FW USB3 2TB
590GB free, PID 107f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 99 102 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 43.2
Write 63.5
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 101
82% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.9
220% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 57%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 500GB
466GB free, PID 2120
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 40.5
Write 38
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 37.7
48% 36.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.4% Above average
MC Read 17
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.2
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 15.8
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z68XP-UD3P Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $559
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback