Asrock B75 Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics81.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B75 Pro3  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121210
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateApr 13 '19 at 19:17
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 92.7
2-Core 186
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 359
48% 361 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.1% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 110
Parallax 93.4
83% 102 fps
MRender 94.6
Gravity 93.8
Splatting 96.3
78% 94.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
284GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 231 240 243 246 248 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 347
Write 313
Mixed 257
SusWrite 239
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 26.9
92% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 182
147% 208 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 129%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
883GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 108 108 108 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 45.5
Write 26
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 108
41% 56 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 62%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
235GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 88 89 90 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 82
Write 76
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 88.1
58% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 59%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
1TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 115 113 115 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
62% Good
Read 103
Write 63.8
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 114
63% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62%
Great: 88%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
3.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 173 175 175 176 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 81.2
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 175
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 103%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBNT 04CD F3-10666CL9-4GBNT 04CB DDR3 1600G 04CB DDR3 1600G 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.2% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 16.5
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75 Pro3 Builds (Compare 483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock B75 Pro3 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $235
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback