bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DH55PJ
Memory6.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '19 at 18:12
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3440
XU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 97
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 170
72% 119 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 326
44% 325 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Gigabyte(1458 3544) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4% Terrible
Lighting 4.97
Reflection 5.81
Parallax 3.91
4% 4.89 fps
MRender 6.43
Gravity 4.93
Splatting 3.52
4% 4.96 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160811AS 160GB-$45
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 40 37 43 48 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 65.9
Write 60.7
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 43.6
39% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 40%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
465GB free
Firmware: GH2OA3C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 115 116 114 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 139
Write 118
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 115
72% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 73%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 DBLT4GN568O 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
54.5% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 18.2
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 50.1
80% 50.1 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,481 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback