Asus Z87-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive82% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z87-PRO  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '19 at 06:24
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 85%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 68.2
2-Core 125
58% 92.3 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 291
34% 261 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 84%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 342 355 360 346 353 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 403
Write 394
Mixed 328
SusWrite 348
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 28.9
92% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 359
269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 82%
Great: 134%
OWC Aura Pro 2012 SSD 120GB
23GB free
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 163 151 159 158 160 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.6% Good
Read 462
Write 165
Mixed 221
SusWrite 158
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 21.7
4K Mixed 27.4
96% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 50.5
DQ Mixed 61.3
51% 74.1 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 63%
Corsair Neutron 128GB-$90
112GB free
Firmware: M310
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 248 247 249 249 250 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 402
Write 246
Mixed 260
SusWrite 248
64% 289 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 28.1
123% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 235
194% 281 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 83%
Kingston SSDNow V Series 128GB
32GB free
Firmware: 506a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 129 96 83 126 104 MB/s
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.5% Above average
Read 275
Write 108
Mixed 155
SusWrite 114
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 61.8
4K Mixed 30.9
103% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 99.5
86% 128 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 45%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
242GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 343 357 361 348 355 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 417
Write 397
Mixed 382
SusWrite 349
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 27.8
92% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 360
270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLT8G3D1608DT2TXOB Kingston KHX2133C11D3/8GX 1315 BLT8G3D1608DT2TXOB Kingston KHX2133C11D3/8GX 32GB
1600, 2133, 1600, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.7% Good
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 22.4
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 21.1
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-PRO Builds (Compare 2,567 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Z87-PRO - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback