Asus Z87-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z87-PRO  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140818
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 13 '19 at 05:01
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 94
1-Core 118
2-Core 232
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 611
61% 495 Pts
64-Core 605
37% 605 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82%
Great: 84%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 398 398 400 398 396 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 485
Mixed 400
SusWrite 399
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 58.5
196% 69.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 361
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 121%
Great: 134%
OWC Aura Pro 2012 SSD 120GB
23GB free
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 167 161 165 163 161 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.4% Good
Read 440
Write 163
Mixed 236
SusWrite 162
55% 250 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 23.4
4K Mixed 26.9
95% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 52.2
DQ Mixed 67
54% 76.6 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 63%
Corsair Neutron 128GB-$90
112GB free
Firmware: M310
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 219 195 207 199 207 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
66% Good
Read 346
Write 247
Mixed 241
SusWrite 205
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 26
101% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 195
147% 197 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66%
Great: 83%
Kingston SSDNow V Series 128GB
32GB free
Firmware: E120506a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 79 148 117 141 119 MB/s
Performing below potential (96th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.2% Above average
Read 245
Write 145
Mixed 181
SusWrite 122
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 57.9
4K Mixed 27.6
95% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 71.3
74% 121 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 45%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
242GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 404 403 408 405 406 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 483
Mixed 459
SusWrite 405
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 56.9
195% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 363
274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 122%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLT8G3D1608DT2TXOB Kingston KHX2133C11D3/8GX 1315 BLT8G3D1608DT2TXOB Kingston KHX2133C11D3/8GX 32GB
1600, 2133, 1600, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.6% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18.3
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 19.8
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 59.9
67% 59.9 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-PRO Builds (Compare 2,567 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Z87-PRO - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback