Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3P  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1360x768x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '19 at 22:51
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 74.9
2-Core 139
63% 101 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 400
36% 304 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M550 128GB-$40
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 224 185 188 168 173 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 388
Write 342
Mixed 294
SusWrite 199
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 73.5
4K Mixed 36.8
127% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 185
157% 230 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 104%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
159GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 79 82 84 84 83 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 10.6
Write 61.4
SusWrite 82.2
37% 51.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.3
150% 2 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 71%
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29
146GB free
Firmware: VT100-50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 47 48 47 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 40.9
Write 44.4
Mixed 31.4
SusWrite 47.2
30% 41 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 38%
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154
96GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 87 86 87 87 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 63.6
Write 34.2
Mixed 38.4
SusWrite 87.1
41% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Atermiter X.A 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
28.9% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 6.8
25% 8.9 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8.3
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-DS3P Builds (Compare 3,209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback