Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 1007U 5,995 User benchmarks, average bench 39% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	40.2% Average	Memory 75.7 1-Core 28.5 2-Core 30.3 35% 44.8 Pts	4-Core 29.8 8-Core 55.9 5% 42.8 Pts	64-Core 69.9 4% 69.9 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz) 28,701 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 126D) 2.2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	1.57% Terrible	Lighting 1.63 Reflection 1.62 Parallax 1.25 1% 1.5 fps	MRender 3.05 Gravity 0.97 Splatting 3.17 2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.57% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$53 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 36 35 2.9 100 97 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	27.7% Poor	Read 307 Write 160 Mixed 177 SusWrite 80.2 40% 181 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 10.5 4K Mixed 10.9 30% 9.37 MB/s	DQ Read 18 DQ Write 24.9 DQ Mixed 19.5 15% 20.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 Hynix HMT325S6EFR8C-PB 6GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32% Below average	MC Read 10.2 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 11.1 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 5 16% 5.43 GB/s	Latency 89 45% 89 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3-3217UIntelBench 43%, 28,188 samples	17x
Celeron 1007UIntelBench 39%, 5,995 samples	15x
Core i5-3317UIntel $225Bench 47%, 26,848 samples	7x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	31x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	19x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	9x

RAM
SH564128FJ8NWRNSQR 0194 SH564568FJ8NZRNSDR 6GBUnknownBench 42%, 320 samples	6x
8JTF5264HZ-1G6D1 1x4GBMicronBench 29%, 179 samples	4x
HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 1x2GBHynixBench 18%, 3,854 samples	3x

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $70