MSI Z270 PC MATE (MS-7A72)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics83.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A72
MotherboardMSI Z270 PC MATE (MS-7A72)  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170203
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateApr 09 '19 at 23:05
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 139
2-Core 279
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 771
79% 636 Pts
64-Core 772
48% 772 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.4% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 114
Parallax 107
85% 108 fps
MRender 98.1
Gravity 98.1
Splatting 97.5
80% 97.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016)
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 89 51 77 44 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 290
Write 278
Mixed 196
SusWrite 64
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 92.1
4K Mixed 8.1
88% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 19.3
54% 114 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 70%
PNY CS1311 480GB-$31
139GB free
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 393 169 176 176 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 485
Mixed 378
SusWrite 260
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 43.6
163% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 202
193% 302 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 102%
Great: 101%
Sandisk S31024G 1TB
67GB free
Firmware: X6107000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 470 475 483 477 429 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 459
Mixed 323
SusWrite 468
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 53.5
171% 64.7 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 252
216% 318 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 118%
Great: 121%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
80GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,363
Write 2212
Mixed 1,416
444% 1,997 MB/s
4K Read 63.9
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 84
284% 99.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,111
DQ Write 995
DQ Mixed 1,047
787% 1,051 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
198GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 127 127 127 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 148
Write 149
Mixed 97.7
SusWrite 127
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$60
528GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 148 149 151 150 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 151
Write 118
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 147
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
73.8% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 21.1
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 23.7
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 PC MATE (MS-7A72) Builds (Compare 2,300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 PC MATE (MS-7A72)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $458
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback