Asus P8P67 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics64.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 PRO  (all builds)
Memory20.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 09 '19 at 20:02
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 95.3
1-Core 118
2-Core 230
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 593
63% 504 Pts
64-Core 592
37% 592 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 86%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.7% Good
Lighting 81.6
Reflection 79.3
Parallax 103
66% 88 fps
MRender 78.9
Gravity 83
Splatting 65.7
61% 75.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X21200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 376 361 368 348 337 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 440
Mixed 290
SusWrite 360
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 30.6
126% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 161
168% 276 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 114%
Sandisk S3 1T00 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 401100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 451 454 447 448 450 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 457
Mixed 389
SusWrite 443
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 40.2
155% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 262
224% 329 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 110%
Great: 118%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
405GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 103 105 106 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 92.7
Write 93.7
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 105
66% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 74%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
1TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 176 177 176 175 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 148
Write 149
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 174
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 CMY16GX3M2A1866C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 CMY16GX3M2A1866C9 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
59.4% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 18.6
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 19.2
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 56.3
71% 56.3 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 PRO Builds (Compare 1,046 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO - $230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $849
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback