Asrock Z170 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z170 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '19 at 15:23
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 92.2
1-Core 143
2-Core 284
95% 173 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 521
72% 536 Pts
64-Core 534
33% 534 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.8% Above average
Lighting 68.6
Reflection 72.5
Parallax 61
56% 67.4 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 66.7
Splatting 68.9
56% 67.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9,172
Write 5,351
Mixed 6,547
1,553% 7,023 MB/s
4K Read 705
4K Write 356
4K Mixed 462
1,850% 508 MB/s
DQ Read 2043
DQ Write 1,731
DQ Mixed 1,805
1,375% 1,860 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB
113GB free
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 53 150 68 108 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 436
Write 332
Mixed 284
SusWrite 116
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 17.5
64% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 37.4
DQ Mixed 40.3
39% 64.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 56%
Seagate ST1500LM006 HN-M151RAD 1.5TB
527GB free
Firmware: 2BC10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 92 92 92 92 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 79.8
Write 71.8
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 91.1
55% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
695GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 110 111 111 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 111
Write 112
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 110
73% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 68%
Seagate Portable 500GB
466GB free, PID 2330
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 106 106 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 106
Write 77.3
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 105
113% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
114% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBD 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 13.6
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 1,143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z170 Extreme4 - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $639
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback