Asus MAXIMUS VIII EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '19 at 14:13
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 105
2-Core 187
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 615
60% 490 Pts
64-Core 618
38% 618 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 170
Parallax 173
101% 156 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 152
Splatting 110
101% 125 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 101%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 406 325 248 249 248 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 409
Write 419
Mixed 368
SusWrite 310
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 83.1
4K Mixed 35.3
127% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 311
235% 316 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 98%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
3GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 64 55 70 67 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 80.5
Write 33.2
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 64.1
43% 58 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
82% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 96%
WD WD10EVCS-63E0B0 10TB
9TB free
Firmware: AV01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 231 228 230 230 231 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 230
Write 224
Mixed 105
SusWrite 230
144% 197 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.2
804% 6.63 MB/s
WD WD10EVCS-63E0B0 1TB
211GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 60 46 55 54 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 56.8
Write 62.3
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 54
35% 48.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
50% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 51%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100
5GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 82 77 77 76 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 71.5
Write 69.8
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 75.9
53% 71.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 68%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120
6TB free
Firmware: AR15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 167 165 176 177 175 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 196 194 191 197 197 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 120
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 192
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 107%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.6% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 21.6
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 17.4
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII EXTREME Builds (Compare 531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII EXTREME - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $935
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback