Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics92.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG ZENITH EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory97.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180416
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateApr 03 '19 at 06:30
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 60.2
1-Core 108
2-Core 214
69% 127 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 820
75% 626 Pts
64-Core 1,859
115% 1,859 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.7% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 139
Parallax 114
100% 125 fps
MRender 87
Gravity 122
Splatting 81.2
78% 96.6 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$198
253GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 880 553 579 554 544 542 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 2069
Write 1,429
Mixed 737
SusWrite 609
268% 1,211 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 59.3
214% 79.3 MB/s
DQ Read 867
DQ Write 693
DQ Mixed 752
570% 771 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 221%
Great: 302%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
907GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 416 427 383 380 381 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 444
Mixed 392
SusWrite 402
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 71.7
4K Mixed 42.7
148% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 259
221% 324 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 106%
Great: 126%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 387 411 394 390 391 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 395
Write 396
Mixed 288
SusWrite 395
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 24
79% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 126
95% 127 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 148 156 148 145 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 136
Mixed 68
SusWrite 148
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 114%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 154 157 157 155 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 149
Write 150
Mixed 93
SusWrite 156
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 100%
H/W RAID 10 8TB
5TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 4.1 4.1 3.8 3.7 3.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
6.91% Terrible
Read 36.7
Write 37
Mixed 30
SusWrite 3.6
34% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
20% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.91%
Great: 13%
H/W RAID 10 8TB
7TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 30 32 29 29 28 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 36.8
Write 27.2
Mixed 29
SusWrite 27.8
40% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
48% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU64GX4M4C3200C16 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
116% Outstanding
MC Read 48.2
MC Write 43.4
MC Mixed 45.6
131% 45.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 21.5
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 127
31% 127 ns
Poor: 105%
This bench: 116%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME - $29

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $834
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback