TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock X99 Extreme3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '19 at 21:36
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 22 cores, 44 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 75.3
2-Core 146
60% 100 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 619
55% 464 Pts
64-Core 2,238
138% 2,238 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 68.4%
 Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
MSI(1462 3722) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
109% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 163
Parallax 160
109% 152 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 150
Splatting 112
117% 148 fps
Poor: 109% ↑
This bench: 109%
 Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKKW010T8 1TB
643GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1149 963 966 957 957 957 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 2,200
Write 1,392
Mixed 1,204
SusWrite 992
322% 1,447 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 95.6
4K Mixed 60.3
198% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 634
DQ Write 415
DQ Mixed 502
380% 517 MB/s
Poor: 165% ↑
This bench: 234%
 Great: 302%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 210 219 221 221 223 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 216
Write 160
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 219
124% 170 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 1.4
377% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑
This bench: 125%
 Great: 262%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
506GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 157 182 175 185 183 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 153
Write 102
Mixed 38
SusWrite 176
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
215% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑
This bench: 94.5%
 Great: 213%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
1TB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 97 106 103 98 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 114
Write 116
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 102
72% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 61.9%
 Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
36GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 93 93 88 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 109
Write 92
Mixed 72
SusWrite 91.3
67% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 57.5%
 Great: 113%
WD Elements 1TB
146GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 58 72 77 72 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 89.5
Write 79
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 69.5
95% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑
This bench: 34.4%
 Great: 43%
WD My Passport 25E4 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 25e4
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 101 102 101 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 104
Write 95.5
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 101
117% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
44% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 39.3%
 Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron TEAMGROUP-UD4-2133 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.4% Good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 20.8
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 13.1
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 62.4%
 Great: 87%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical X99 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 200 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme3

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel  $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples118x
Core i7-5930KIntel  $599Bench 80%, 34,039 samples25x
Core i7-6800KIntel  $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples21x
GPU
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples24x
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples13x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples13x
SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples8x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples7x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsairBench 83%, 5,673 samples7x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2133 2x16GBMicronBench 68%, 96 samples6x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $463
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback