TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock X99 Extreme3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '19 at 21:29
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 22 cores, 44 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 79
1-Core 79
2-Core 157
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 605
51% 439 Pts
64-Core 2,222
138% 2,222 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 64.9%
 Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
MSI(1462 3722) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
110% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 161
Parallax 154
110% 150 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 149
Splatting 112
118% 149 fps
Poor: 109% ↑
This bench: 110%
 Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKKW010T8 1TB
625GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1103 889 882 759 851 901 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 2,079
Write 1,314
Mixed 1,162
SusWrite 898
303% 1,363 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 95
4K Mixed 59.1
193% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 682
DQ Write 422
DQ Mixed 548
409% 550 MB/s
Poor: 165% ↑
This bench: 223%
 Great: 302%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 228 230 229 227 227 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 210
Write 188
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 226
128% 176 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.6
415% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑
This bench: 125%
 Great: 262%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
506GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 155 177 179 185 183 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 111
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 176
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑
This bench: 97.3%
 Great: 213%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
1TB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 97 106 102 99 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 124
Write 115
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 102
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 64.8%
 Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
36GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 91 95 93 87 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 103
Write 94
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 91.5
64% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 55.7%
 Great: 113%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
1TB free, PID b207
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 124 124 124 119 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 102
Write 89
Mixed 32
SusWrite 123
115% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 42.9%
 Great: 53%
WD My Passport 25E4 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 25e4
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 101 101 102 101 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 113
Write 86
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 100
114% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
40% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 40.3%
 Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron TEAMGROUP-UD4-2133 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
62.2% Good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 20.4
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.3
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 62.2%
 Great: 87%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical X99 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 200 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme3

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel  $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples118x
Core i7-5930KIntel  $599Bench 80%, 34,039 samples25x
Core i7-6800KIntel  $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples21x
GPU
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples24x
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples13x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples13x
SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples8x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples7x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsairBench 83%, 5,673 samples7x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2133 2x16GBMicronBench 68%, 96 samples6x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $463
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback