Asrock X99 Extreme3

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	197% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X99 Extreme3 (all builds)
Memory	23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180406
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 11 '19 at 23:19
Run Duration	245 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel 0000 210 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 22 cores, 44 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	65.5% Good	Memory 75.7 1-Core 77.5 2-Core 142 59% 98.5 Pts	4-Core 298 8-Core 600 53% 449 Pts	64-Core 2,137 132% 2,137 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3746) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.4% Poor	Lighting 35.5 Reflection 27.9 Parallax 33.5 29% 32.3 fps	MRender 33.3 Gravity 34.2 Splatting 32.7 27% 33.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKKW010T8 1TB 3,058 User benchmarks, average bench 248% 559GB free (System drive) Firmware: 001C SusWrite @10s intervals: 1241 716 793 833 830 774 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	197% Outstanding	Read 2,038 Write 1434 Mixed 833 SusWrite 865 287% 1,292 MB/s	4K Read 48.6 4K Write 50.7 4K Mixed 38.9 150% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 611 DQ Write 148 DQ Mixed 528 350% 429 MB/s
Poor: 165% ↑ This bench: 197% Great: 302%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 8TB 1,740 User benchmarks, average bench 166% 4TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 259 265 250 256 253 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	151% Outstanding	Read 270 Write 257 Mixed 82.5 SusWrite 254 157% 216 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 1.6 402% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 151% Great: 262%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB 13,609 User benchmarks, average bench 146% 717GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 34 36 32 35 33 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	27.2% Poor	Read 58.5 Write 69 Mixed 12.7 SusWrite 36.6 32% 44.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.1 23% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 213%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 36GB free Firmware: CC24 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 94 93 87 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Read 108 Write 88 Mixed 59 SusWrite 91.5 64% 86.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1TB free Firmware: CC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 96 103 101 99 103 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Read 127 Write 116 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 100 74% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 75%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 700 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1TB free, PID b207 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 126 126 124 127 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	42.9% Average	Read 99.7 Write 102 Mixed 31 SusWrite 126 120% 89.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 22% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 53%
WD My Passport 25E4 4TB 385 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 3TB free, PID 25e4 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 101 97 100 99 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	39.8% Below average	Read 110 Write 96.2 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 99.7 117% 89.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 45% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 62%
WD Elements 107C 3TB 3,265 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 705GB free, PID 107c Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 108 108 107 108 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	47.2% Average	Read 110 Write 111 Mixed 82.2 SusWrite 108 139% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 58%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 223GB free, PID 1042 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 55 58 56 59 65 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	28.2% Poor	Read 81.5 Write 68 Mixed 50.3 SusWrite 59.2 85% 64.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 43%
ASMT 2105 500GB 869 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 160GB free, PID 5136 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 11 11 11 11 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	4.75% Terrible	Read 8.5 Write 10.5 Mixed 8 SusWrite 11.8 14% 9.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.1 14% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 4.75% Great: 159%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron TEAMGROUP-UD4-2133 2x16GB 96 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 16 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 12.1 30% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 89 45% 89 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme3

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	117x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	24x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	21x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	24x
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	13x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	13x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	12x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	8x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsairBench 83%, 5,673 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	6x
16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 2x8GBMicronBench 68%, 1,302 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $424

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16