Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive422% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X399 DESIGNARE EX
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF  (all builds)
Memory60.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '19 at 10:00
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 62
1-Core 122
2-Core 228
74% 137 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 908
80% 681 Pts
64-Core 2,344
145% 2,344 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan RTX-$1,295
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 203
Parallax 224
117% 190 fps
MRender 232
Gravity 212
Splatting 131
150% 191 fps
Poor: 134%
This bench: 123%
Great: 179%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 280GB-$160
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E2010325 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1870 1864 1894 1906 1905 1906 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
422% Outstanding
Read 2,256
Write 1,907
Mixed 2,061
SusWrite 1,891
457% 2,029 MB/s
4K Read 182
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 164
570% 169 MB/s
DQ Read 950
DQ Write 845
DQ Mixed 874
662% 890 MB/s
Poor: 302%
This bench: 422%
Great: 559%
Samsung Portable SSD T3 250GB
94GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 309 309 310 310 310 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 390
Write 383
Mixed 352
SusWrite 319
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 26.6
87% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 97.8
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 106
80% 107 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 75%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
215GB free
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2016 2032 2034 2034 2033 2025 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
334% Outstanding
Read 2,404
Write 1,949
Mixed 970
SusWrite 2,029
411% 1,838 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 67.6
230% 82.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,004
DQ Write 916
DQ Mixed 900
692% 940 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 334%
Great: 353%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$139
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 51.5
MC Write 54.1
MC Mixed 49.7
148% 51.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 31.4
SC Mixed 23.1
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 130%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF Builds (Compare 214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,470
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback