Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 136%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive431% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X399 DESIGNARE EX
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF  (all builds)
Memory59.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180917
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 02 '19 at 09:38
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 74.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 235
77% 141 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 911
81% 685 Pts
64-Core 2,370
147% 2,370 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan RTX-$1,295
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
133% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 21.6
Parallax 216
133% 134 fps
MRender 255
Gravity 217
Splatting 133
158% 201 fps
Poor: 134%
This bench: 133%
Great: 179%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 280GB-$160
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E2010325 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1841 1864 1878 1894 1899 1905 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
431% Outstanding
Read 2,247
Write 1,909
Mixed 2,066
SusWrite 1,880
456% 2,025 MB/s
4K Read 188
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 173
595% 176 MB/s
DQ Read 996
DQ Write 883
DQ Mixed 916
693% 932 MB/s
Poor: 302%
This bench: 431%
Great: 559%
Samsung Portable SSD T3 250GB
94GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 311 312 312 311 311 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 398
Write 388
Mixed 359
SusWrite 320
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 34
4K Mixed 26.7
84% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 100
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 112
86% 114 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 75%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
215GB free
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2048 2069 2068 2071 2071 1965 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
340% Outstanding
Read 2,445
Write 1,954
Mixed 964
SusWrite 2,049
415% 1,853 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 68.1
237% 86.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,034
DQ Write 957
DQ Mixed 948
724% 980 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 340%
Great: 353%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$139
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
189% Outstanding
MC Read 76.4
MC Write 78.2
MC Mixed 73.3
217% 76 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 43.4
SC Mixed 30.5
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 189%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF Builds (Compare 214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,470
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback