Asus K52JT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus K52JT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K52JT
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110125
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 01 '19 at 01:25
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 480
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Memory 33.2
1-Core 67.8
2-Core 110
39% 70.3 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 131
19% 140 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6300M
Asus(1043 1C92) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.93% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.69
Parallax 1.28
1% 1.32 fps
MRender 1.52
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 1.83
1% 1.34 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.93%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,441
Write 28.5
Mixed 63.2
107% 511 MB/s
4K Read 251
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 3.7
386% 85.7 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5273CH0-CH9 80AD HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 8.6
20% 7.03 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 5.7
13% 4.63 GB/s
Latency 237
17% 237 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K52JT Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K52JT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $232
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback