Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '19 at 11:37
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 72.7
2-Core 143
60% 98.9 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 341
38% 298 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Asus(1043 83F7) 2GB
CLim: 1365 MHz, MLim: 1507 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Lighting 46
Reflection 30
Parallax 40.3
38% 38.7 fps
MRender 53.2
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 30.1
23% 28.9 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 273 276 278 276 277 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 415
Mixed 344
SusWrite 290
85% 381 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 44.1
148% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 182
154% 225 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 118%
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
139GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 397 409 412 235 207 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 419
Mixed 416
SusWrite 341
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 46.2
149% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 220
172% 236 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 123%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
931GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 164 165 164 140 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 162
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 156
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.2% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 15.1
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 10.9
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback