Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics38.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '19 at 11:44
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 46
2-Core 146
56% 93.5 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 431
43% 351 Pts
64-Core 435
27% 435 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Asus(1043 83F7) 2GB
CLim: 1365 MHz, MLim: 1507 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Lighting 46.1
Reflection 41.7
Parallax 55.2
38% 47.7 fps
MRender 53
Gravity 54.5
Splatting 40.3
39% 49.3 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 277 273 277 277 276 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 460
Mixed 375
SusWrite 292
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 81
4K Mixed 48.7
165% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 176
153% 226 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 118%
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
139GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 420 410 428 428 427 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 249
Mixed 429
SusWrite 421
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 50.3
166% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 181
154% 226 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 109%
Great: 123%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
931GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 142 159 164 164 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 155
Mixed 88.4
SusWrite 156
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.2
237% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.8% Average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 17.5
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.1
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback