HP Notebook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8226
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '19 at 16:42
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 45%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 145
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 248
33% 249 Pts
64-Core 254
16% 254 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 62%
Great: 57%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SNAT-256G-1006 256GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2311006
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 455
Write 236
Mixed 219
66% 303 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 0.1
38% 10 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 83%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$56
105GB free
Firmware: UF300000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 140 149 99 93 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 420
Write 271
Mixed 271
SusWrite 121
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 38.1
4K Mixed 14.1
67% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 92.3
DQ Mixed 42.4
49% 84.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 859B CT8G4SFD8213.C16FHP 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
67% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 22
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 19.9
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 67%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback