Asus P8B75-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics62.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-V  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121011
Uptime31 Days
Run DateMar 23 '19 at 08:51
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 205
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 503
53% 424 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.4% Good
Lighting 78.6
Reflection 77.7
Parallax 68.5
64% 75 fps
MRender 72.1
Gravity 71.6
Splatting 72.9
59% 72.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 230 80 68 77 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 397
Write 451
Mixed 309
SusWrite 116
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 64.6
4K Mixed 34.6
120% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 178
155% 223 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
188GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 141 131 128 120 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 144
Write 144
Mixed 83.8
SusWrite 129
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 109%
ST310005 28AS 1TB
577GB free, PID 8561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.6% Very poor
Read 32
Write 28.5
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 2.3
27% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 18%
ST2000DM 006-2DM164 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 8561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 32
Write 28.5
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 17.8
34% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 78%
TrekStor DS maxi light 30 2TB
79GB free, PID 0050
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 28
Write 23.5
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 19.6
31% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.3
115% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 16
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.2
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-V Builds (Compare 1,148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $442
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback