bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DP67BG
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120717
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 22 '19 at 14:47
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 95.2
1-Core 103
2-Core 206
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 397
54% 401 Pts
64-Core 405
25% 405 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1620 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.2.3
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 31% Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB-$80
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.28.20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 186 177 164 175 178 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 421
Write 250
Mixed 257
SusWrite 173
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 30.3
109% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 139
136% 217 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 91%
SanDisk Extreme Pro 480GB-$199
161GB free
Firmware: X21200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 444 446 447 446 445 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 450
Mixed 326
SusWrite 437
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 31.7
115% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 162
174% 290 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
811GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 114 112 112 111 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 117
Write 109
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 112
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x434D5A384758334D32413136303043392020 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 17.8
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 56.5
71% 56.5 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,464 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback